Conclusion: Hindu Muslims are just pawns in the game of power

Ramesh Ojha

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has repeatedly reminded the central government to do something about the attacks on Hindus in Bangladesh. It is not the state government's right to intervene in another country's affairs, this is a matter for the central government and it should take the role. It is natural to be reminded of Ramman when you live in it. Hindutvaists revel in the past and heroism. Around the clock they live in the past and woo the 'other'. This is their constant. So-and-so made so-and-so mistakes in the past for which Hindus are paying the price. But never mind, we are sitting now no one can even bend the hair of Hindus. The era of power hungry and lowly people pampering minority communities is over. We have the ability to talk to the enemy eye to eye, we are not cowards and traitors who forget Hinduism and eat biryani with the enemy. Thus you may have heard of the glorious past of the Hindus and of the rank Hindus who were occasionally wronged by others, and now you may have heard of the bravery that no one can bend a hair. Apparently, Mamata Banerjee reminds him by looking at Lag. The Hindus living in Bangladesh have been under attack ever since the people (mainly youth) revolted in Bangladesh last August and Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina had to flee the country. It has been increasing since few days now and the increase is alarming. On this side the Government of India is inactive, more than passive, it does not know what to do. Boasting can lead to power, but not governance. China, Pakistan, Nepal, Maldives and now Bangladesh have shown this. Bangladesh says that the Indian government is giving shelter to Sheikh Hasina, so people are angry and Hindus are being attacked. Sheikh Hasina is a Bangladeshi criminal and should be handed over to us by the Indian government. Government of India cannot do that either. No other country gives shelter to Sheikh Hasina. India's situation is like a betel nut in the middle of rain. As for the Hindus living in Bangladesh, the Indian government cannot do anything. If Hindutvaists can't do anything against Bangladesh and Nepal, China is a superpower. That is why Mamata Banerjee fondly reminds us that if the opportunity has come to change history by saving Hindus, then show it. First a bit of the past. On April 15, 1946, the Hindu Mahasabha met at Tarkeshwar near Kolkata and passed a resolution giving the final decision on the partition of Bengal to Dr Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, president of the Hindu Mahasabha. Vinayak Damodar Savarkar was present in that convention. In May, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee wrote to Viceroy Mountbatten that whether India should be partitioned or not, Bengal should be partitioned. We do not accept Hindus and Hindu majority areas being ruled by Muslims. But what about Hindus living in Muslim majority areas? Their number was about 25 percent, not less. Every fourth Hindu lived in a Muslim majority area. But he didn't care about that. However, the Muslim League was not worried either. The same proportion ie 25 percent of Muslims lived in majority Hindu areas. He did not care about the Hindus living in East Bengal (now Bangladesh) while demanding that Bengal should be partitioned whether or not India was partitioned. They had no idea or concern that the lives of 25 percent Hindus living in East Pakistan would become insecure. That is, when the massacre of minority Hindus took place in Noakhali in East Bengal, only Gandhi went to save the Hindus, whom he called a coward. Not a single Hindutva went to Noakhali. Lord Mountbatten's famous quote may be remembered. He said that only a one-man battalion has established peace on the eastern front. One more thing from the past. Subhash Chandra Bose's brother Saratchandra Bose and Shaheed Suhrawardy proposed that we ie Bengali Hindus and Bengali Muslims were ready to live together if a united Bengal was established as an independent country like Pakistan in the West. Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee opposed that proposal. In short, partition of India or not we must partition Bengal. We don't even want an independent Bengal, because it has a condition of sharing and we don't want to live with Muslims. Dr Shyama Prasad Mukherjee was the founder president of Bharatiya Jana Sangh (now BJP). At present, Hindutvadis cry at the plight of Hindus in Bangladesh, but cannot do anything. India would not have been partitioned in 1947 if the Hindutvaists and the Muslim League had thought about what would happen to the minority communities living in those communities' majority areas. And a little about Shaurya. Is there any option for the rulers of India? The only option is to convince the government of Bangladesh. If you don't understand, to develop worldview. to pressurize But the problem is that Vishwadesho reminds the Hindutva rulers of India of their anti-Muslim attitude and bulldozer policy and it is not Palve. On the other hand, even the rulers of Bangladesh are not concerned about what will happen to the Muslims in India as a result of the anti-Hindu attitude. This is a power game in which Hindus and Muslims are only pawns. }